Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. H. M. (1878)
[1878] SZCO 1
Decided 9 January 1878 · Chief Justice Hendrik Ehrlich
The Court of Chronological Offences[1878] SZCO 1
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. H. M.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: H. M.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Berging. Ruling: acquitted: the witness was drunk.
So ordered. The court rose at the rising of the court.
Authorities cited
No earlier ruling was cited to the court; the matter was decided on its facts.
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. U. K. [1964] SZCO 13 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. K. B. [2000] SZCO 19 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.