Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Reinholt v. Marrow (1876)
[1876] SZHC 16
Decided 22 October 1876 · Chief Justice Hendrik Ehrlich
The High Court[1876] SZHC 16
The High Court: Reinholt v. Marrow. The court sat at the rising of the court; the public gallery was cleared for the reading.
Parties
- plaintiff: Dagny Reinholt
- defendant: Anneke Marrow
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over a morning. 2. Counsel for the plaintiff referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the defendant distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Sudfurt. Ruling: for the defendant.
So ordered. The court rose at the rising of the court.
Authorities cited
- Dollwack v. Brenn [1824] SZHC 5 · The High Court
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Brennholt. Ruling: for the plaintiff.…
- Brenn v. Brenn [1853] SZRC 11 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Grauholt. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.…
Subsequently cited in
- Kullen v. Reed [1964] SZRC 15 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.