Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. B. M. (1871)
[1871] SZCO 7
Decided 15 June 1871 · Chief Justice Magnus Vikbeil
The Court of Chronological Offences[1871] SZCO 7
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. B. M.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: B. M.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over two days. 2. Counsel for the accused referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the prosecutor distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning possession of an unyear record (a wine label). Ruling: 11 months and forfeiture.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
No earlier ruling was cited to the court; the matter was decided on its facts.
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. M. H. [1889] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. P. E. [1918] SZCO 13 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. E. W. [1927] SZCO 2 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. H. B. [1982] SZCO 17 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.