Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. V. A. (1871)
[1871] SZCO 9
Decided 31 August 1871 · Chief Justice Magnus Vikbeil
The Court of Chronological Offences[1871] SZCO 9
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. V. A.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: V. A.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over two days. 2. Counsel for the accused referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the prosecutor distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Salzhafen. Ruling: fined 143 marka.
So ordered. The court rose at the rising of the court.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. I. B. [1865] SZCO 4 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Salzhafen. Ruling: acquitted: the witness was drunk.…
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. O. H. [1886] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. W. O. [1954] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. P. S. [1961] SZCO 8 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.