Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. O. G. (1867)
[1867] SZCO 5
Decided 6 May 1867 · Chief Justice Josef Stirloss
The Court of Chronological Offences[1867] SZCO 5
The Crown v. O. G., The Court of Chronological Offences. Judgment was delivered after a short adjournment, the parties being represented.
Parties
- accused: O. G.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 4 years and the press forfeit.
So ordered. The court rose at the rising of the court.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. I. W. [1866] SZCO 1 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Vellhausen. Ruling: acquitted: the witness was drunk.…
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. K. T. [1885] SZCO 1 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. K. D. [1900] SZCO 9 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. V. M. [1937] SZCO 2 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. P. T. [1961] SZCO 13 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. N. H. [1980] SZCO 19 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. A. K. [1992] SZCO 5 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.