Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Stiegl v. Falk (1865)
[1865] SZHC 14
Decided 6 July 1865 · Chief Justice Josef Stirloss
The High Court[1865] SZHC 14
In The High Court. Stiegl v. Falk. The court heard argument for the plaintiff and for the defendant and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- plaintiff: Anton Stiegl
- defendant: Gudrun Falk
Judgment
1. We have read the pleadings and heard counsel. 2. The record was read. 3. The particulars are as the headnote states.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Salzhafen. Ruling: for the defendant.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
- Brenn v. Borar [1814] SZRC 5 (Cap) · The Regional Court of The Capital District
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Tarnmoor. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.…
- Hallin v. Brenn [1818] SZRC 1 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Hochstadt. Ruling: for the defendant.…
Subsequently cited in
- Dill v. Vetter [1922] SZHC 25 · The High Court
- Soner v. Brenn [1942] SZHC 14 · The High Court
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.