Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. C. W. (1862)
[1862] SZCO 11
Decided 16 December 1862 · Chief Justice Josef Stirloss
The Court of Chronological Offences[1862] SZCO 11
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. C. W.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: C. W.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning possession of a clock face with an unlicensed year. Ruling: the clock destroyed; no further penalty.
So ordered. The court rose when the court resumed after the midday adjournment.
Authorities cited
No earlier ruling was cited to the court; the matter was decided on its facts.
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. P. M. [1905] SZCO 13 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. O. K. [1917] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.