Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
The Crown v. O. K. (1860)
[1860] SZHC 10
Decided 11 June 1860 · Chief Justice Aurel Brenn
The High Court[1860] SZHC 10
The Crown v. O. K.. Before The High Court. The matter came on for hearing and was disposed of as set out below; the ruling is entered in the Law Reports under the year given.
Parties
- accused: Ottmar Ketmel
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over a morning. 2. Counsel for the accused referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the prosecutor distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 6 months.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
No earlier ruling was cited to the court; the matter was decided on its facts.
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. T. O. [1866] SZCO 12 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. E. B. [1874] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. R. H. [1890] SZCO 18 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.