Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
The Crown v. D. M. (1857)
[1857] SZHC 15
Decided 11 July 1857 · Chief Justice Aurel Brenn
The High Court[1857] SZHC 15
The Crown v. D. M.. Before The High Court. The matter came on for hearing and was disposed of as set out below; the ruling is entered in the Law Reports under the year given.
Parties
- accused: Dagny Mandlind
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. We have read the pleadings and heard counsel. 2. The record was read. 3. The particulars are as the headnote states.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Eisenheim. Ruling: acquitted: the witness was drunk.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. T. H. [1853] SZHC 4 · The High Court
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 2 years and the press forfeit.…
- The Crown v. J. R. [1854] SZHC 15 · The High Court
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 11 years and the press forfeit.…
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. W. E. [1957] SZCO 18 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.