Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Ostrand v. Crull (1842)
[1842] SZHC 8
Decided 20 June 1842 · Chief Justice Edvard Norrholt
The High Court[1842] SZHC 8
In The High Court. Ostrand v. Crull. The court heard argument for the plaintiff and for the defendant and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- plaintiff: Aurel Ostrand
- defendant: Dorothea Crull
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Berging. Ruling: for the defendant.
The judgment was read in open court when the court resumed after the midday adjournment. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
No earlier ruling was cited to the court; the matter was decided on its facts.
Subsequently cited in
- Hallin v. Hallin [1870] SZRC 1 (Kess) · The Regional Court of Kesselhöh
- Rademann v. Klastwang [1931] SZRC 10 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Heide v. Schall [1938] SZRC 10 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Pendnen v. Wendl [2010] SZHC 5 · The High Court
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.