Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Hauk v. Moor (1833)
[1833] SZHC 4
Decided 19 February 1833 · Chief Justice Ottmar Bohm
The High Court[1833] SZHC 4
Hauk v. Moor. Before The High Court. The matter came on for hearing and was disposed of as set out below; the ruling is entered in the Law Reports under the year given.
Parties
- plaintiff: Jorn Hauk
- defendant: Katrin Moor
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Tarnmoor. Ruling: for the plaintiff.
The judgment was read in open court at half past 3 in the afternoon. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
- Brenn v. Moor [1806] SZRC 5 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Berging. Ruling: for the plaintiff.…
- Zeller v. Takmeng [1817] SZHC 5 · The High Court
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Lindenmar. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.…
- Hauk v. Moor [1831] SZRC 5 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Marschau. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.…
Subsequently cited in
- Hallin v. Teilldis [1837] SZHC 10 · The High Court
- Brenn v. Brenn [1975] SZRC 16 (Norr) · The Regional Court of Norrfeld
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.