Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. R. K. (2025)
[2025] SZCO 14
Decided 12 November 2025 · Chief Justice Oskar Marsch
The Court of Chronological Offences[2025] SZCO 14
The Court of Chronological Offences: The Crown v. R. K.. The court sat at the rising of the court; the public gallery was cleared for the reading.
Parties
- accused: R. K.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Tarnmund. Ruling: acquitted: the witness was drunk.
So ordered. The court rose at the rising of the court.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. B. K. [1878] SZCO 9 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Hochstadt. Ruling: acquitted: the witness was drunk.…
- The Crown v. D. I. [1981] SZCO 2 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Lindenmar. Ruling: 4 months.…
Subsequently cited in
Not yet cited.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.