Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Regional Court of Westgau · Certified transcript
Ilgen v. Teter (2025)
[2025] SZRC 19 (West)
Heard 6 September 2025 · Before the judge of the Regional Court · The report
The shorthand writer's transcript of the hearing, certified by the court.
The Regional Court of Westgau · Transcript of proceedings[2025] SZRC 19 (West)
Appearances
- plaintiff: Theo Ilgen
- defendant: Monika Teter
Proceedings
The court sat at 10.00. The Clerk called the case. Counsel announced their appearances for the record.
The Clerk read the claim: a boundary between two farms, at Hollstadt. The defendant denied it. Counsel for the plaintiff opened. The matter was one of fact and the court would decide it on the evidence.
Witness for the plaintiff: a retired sergeant of the Marsh Regiments
A retired sergeant of the Marsh Regiments was sworn and examined.
Q. You know both parties? A. I have known them 20 years. Q. And the matter in dispute? A. I understood there was a quarrel about a boundary between two farms. Everyone understood that. Q. What did you see yourself? A. I was at Hollstadt that morning, on my own business, and saw what the whole street saw.
Cross-examined. Q. You are a friend of the plaintiff? A. I am a friend of both. Q. You dined with the plaintiff last week? A. I dined at the inn and the plaintiff was there. The Judge: That will do.
Witness for the defence: the landlord of the inn
The landlord of the inn was called for the defence and sworn.
Q. You were with the accused that day? A. All day. Q. From when? A. From before first light until dark. Q. And he did nothing of the kind alleged? A. Nothing that I saw, and I saw all he did.
Cross-examined. Q. You are a friend of the plaintiff? A. I am a friend of both. Q. You dined with the plaintiff last week? A. I dined at the inn and the plaintiff was there. The Judge: That will do.
Witness for the defence: a constable of the town watch
A constable of the town watch was called by the defence.
Q. You were with the accused that day? A. All day. Q. From when? A. From shortly before the evening bell until dark. Q. And he did nothing of the kind alleged? A. Nothing that I saw, and I saw all he did.
Cross-examined. Q. You did not see the document? A. I saw a paper. Q. You could not read it from where you stood? A. I could not, and I did not try.
Submissions
Counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the claim was made out. Counsel for the defendant submitted that it was not, and cited the authorities. The court retired.
Judgment
The court resumed. The judgment as delivered, and as entered in the Reports:
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Hollstadt. Ruling: for the defendant.
Costs
Costs to follow the event. The court rose at ten in the forenoon.
Certified transcript. Names of witnesses are omitted from the public copy and are held on the court's file. The ruling as reported. · The legal code.