Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. M. W. (2020)
[2020] SZCO 11
Decided 28 May 2020 · Chief Justice Maria Mesen
The Court of Chronological Offences[2020] SZCO 11
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. M. W.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: M. W.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. We have read the pleadings and heard counsel. 2. The record was read. 3. The particulars are as the headnote states.
Held
Concerning possession of an unyear record (a letter) found at Dammsee. Ruling: acquitted for want of evidence that the figure denoted a year.
The judgment was read in open court at the rising of the court. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. H. U. [2019] SZCO 15 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 10 years and the press forfeit.…
- The Crown v. S. G. [2020] SZCO 1 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinwick. Ruling: fined 120811 marka.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.