Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Fuchs v. Rademann (2018)
[2018] SZHC 5
Decided 10 February 2018 · Chief Justice Maria Mesen
The High Court[2018] SZHC 5
Fuchs v. Rademann, The High Court. Judgment was delivered in writing, the parties being represented.
Parties
- plaintiff: Stefan Fuchs
- defendant: Birgit Rademann
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning a contract for coal not delivered. Ruling: contract void.
The judgment was read in open court at the rising of the court. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
- Kolm v. Hallin [1817] SZHC 12 · The High Court
Concerning a contract for iron rails not delivered. Ruling: damages of 3853 marka.…
- Birk v. Moor [1885] SZHC 3 · The High Court
Concerning a contract for a consignment of paper not delivered. Ruling: contract void.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.