Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. H. W. (2016)
[2016] SZCO 10
Decided 29 July 2016 · Chief Justice Maria Mesen
The Court of Chronological Offences[2016] SZCO 10
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. H. W.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: H. W.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning possession of an unyear record (a coin die). Ruling: 7 months and forfeiture.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. H. R. [1847] SZHC 17 · The High Court
Concerning possession of an unyear record (a diary). Ruling: 6 years.…
- The Crown v. P. H. [1942] SZCO 17 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning possession of a clock face with an unlicensed year. Ruling: the clock destroyed; no further penalty.…
- The Crown v. A. M. [2014] SZCO 21 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning possession of a clock face with an unlicensed year. Ruling: the clock destroyed; no further penalty.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.