Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Hallolt v. Hallin (2015)
[2015] SZHC 3
Decided 19 January 2015 · Chief Justice Maria Mesen
The High Court[2015] SZHC 3
In The High Court. Hallolt v. Hallin. The court heard argument for the plaintiff and for the defendant and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- plaintiff: Stefan Hallolt
- defendant: Anna Hallin
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over two days. 2. Counsel for the plaintiff referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the defendant distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning an article in The Evening Courier. Ruling: apology ordered.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
- Reller v. Amsel [1970] SZRC 14 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: apology ordered.…
- Kaltz v. Zeller [2004] SZHC 30 · The High Court
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: dismissed: fair comment.…
- Fenn v. Treingbenn [2007] SZRC 22 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
Concerning an article in The Evening Courier. Ruling: for the plaintiff, 229614 marka.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.