Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. R. V. (2011)
[2011] SZCO 11
Decided 15 September 2011 · Chief Justice Maria Mesen
The Court of Chronological Offences[2011] SZCO 11
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. R. V.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: R. V.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Lindenmar. Ruling: fined 37341 marka.
The judgment was read in open court at ten in the forenoon. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. A. B. [1957] SZCO 11 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Sudholt. Ruling: 14 months.…
- The Crown v. E. B. [1962] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Salzhafen. Ruling: acquitted: the witness was drunk.…
- The Crown v. L. R. [2005] SZCO 16 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 15 months.…
Subsequently cited in
Not yet cited.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.