Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. P. S. (2003)
[2003] SZCO 9
Decided 26 July 2003 · Chief Justice Peter Brenn
The Court of Chronological Offences[2003] SZCO 9
The Crown v. P. S., The Court of Chronological Offences. Judgment was delivered from the bench, the parties being represented.
Parties
- accused: P. S.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 7 years and the press forfeit.
The ruling was entered by the Clerk and the court proceeded to other business.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. B. M. [1856] SZHC 18 · The High Court
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 11 months.…
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. K. P. [1944] SZCO 10 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Grauburg. Ruling: fined 1551 marka.…
- The Crown v. P. D. [1962] SZCO 12 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 9 years and the press forfeit.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.