Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. S. L. (2002)
[2002] SZCO 12
Decided 28 October 2002 · Chief Justice Peter Brenn
The Court of Chronological Offences[2002] SZCO 12
The Crown v. S. L.. Before The Court of Chronological Offences. The matter came on for hearing and was disposed of as set out below; the ruling is entered in the Law Reports under the year given.
Parties
- accused: S. L.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The proceedings were commenced in the usual form. 2. The accused was heard first and the prosecutor in reply. 3. We reserved judgment and now deliver it.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 5 years and the press forfeit.
The judgment was read in open court at the rising of the court. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. K. L. [1868] SZCO 7 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 14 months.…
- The Crown v. L. J. [1982] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 4 months.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.