Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Kessler v. Brenn (2001)
[2001] SZHC 3
Decided 29 January 2001 · Chief Justice Peter Brenn
The High Court[2001] SZHC 3
In The High Court. Kessler v. Brenn. The court heard argument for the plaintiff and for the defendant and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- plaintiff: Uwe Kessler
- defendant: Dieter Brenn
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning an article in The Evening Courier. Ruling: apology ordered.
So ordered. The court rose shortly after noon.
Authorities cited
- Fenn v. Brenn [1880] SZRC 7 (Norr) · The Regional Court of Norrfeld
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: dismissed: fair comment.…
- Durhardt v. Fenn [1951] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: dismissed: fair comment.…
Subsequently cited in
Not yet cited.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.