Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. B. E. (2000)
[2000] SZCO 14
Decided 9 June 2000 · Chief Justice Peter Brenn
The Court of Chronological Offences[2000] SZCO 14
The Court of Chronological Offences: The Crown v. B. E.. The court sat late in the afternoon sitting; the public gallery was cleared for the reading.
Parties
- accused: B. E.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 3 years and the press forfeit.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. E. R. [1927] SZCO 1 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 8 years and the press forfeit.…
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. A. B. [2015] SZCO 14 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.