Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Amsel v. Brack (1827)
[1827] SZHC 4
Decided 2 April 1827 · Chief Justice Ottmar Bohm
The High Court[1827] SZHC 4
The High Court: Amsel v. Brack. The court sat when the court resumed after the midday adjournment; the public gallery was cleared for the reading.
Parties
- plaintiff: Lorenz Amsel
- defendant: Gudrun Brack
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over a morning. 2. Counsel for the plaintiff referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the defendant distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Tarnmund. Ruling: for the defendant.
So ordered. The court rose when the court resumed after the midday adjournment.
Authorities cited
None. The court proceeded on first principles and the terms of the acts concerned.
Subsequently cited in
- Brenn v. Brenn [1833] SZHC 1 · The High Court
- Longar v. Brundfeld [1836] SZRC 7 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
- Grau v. Brenn [1845] SZRC 1 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Holt v. Norrholt [1847] SZRC 12 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Kaffmann v. Vachost [1876] SZRC 12 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
- Stiegl v. Vellmann [1970] SZRC 28 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.