Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Moor v. Gansel (1826)
[1826] SZHC 5
Decided 17 March 1826 · Chief Justice Ottmar Bohm
The High Court[1826] SZHC 5
Moor v. Gansel, The High Court. Judgment was delivered from the bench, the parties being represented.
Parties
- plaintiff: Frida Moor
- defendant: Vera Gansel
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over one day. 2. Counsel for the plaintiff referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the defendant distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Sudfurt. Ruling: for the plaintiff.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
- Hesat v. Lamm [1809] SZRC 4 (Norr) · The Regional Court of Norrfeld
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Norrwick. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.…
- Fenn v. Trost [1825] SZRC 21 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Dammberg. Ruling: for the defendant.…
Subsequently cited in
- Voss v. Holt [1932] SZRC 22 (Kess) · The Regional Court of Kesselhöh
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.