Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Brenn v. Wendholt (1824)
[1824] SZHC 2
Decided 9 February 1824 · Chief Justice Ottmar Bohm
The High Court[1824] SZHC 2
Brenn v. Wendholt, The High Court. Judgment was delivered in writing, the parties being represented.
Parties
- plaintiff: Gustav Brenn
- defendant: Konrad Wendholt
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over one day. 2. Counsel for the plaintiff referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the defendant distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: dismissed: fair comment.
The ruling was entered by the Clerk and the court proceeded to other business.
Authorities cited
- Marsch v. Thal [1821] SZRC 1 (Cap) · The Regional Court of The Capital District
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: apology ordered.…
- Moor v. Nagel [1821] SZRC 8 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: apology ordered.…
Subsequently cited in
- Hallin v. Fenn [1837] SZRC 12 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
- Tolmann v. Hallin [1847] SZRC 3 (Cap) · The Regional Court of The Capital District
- Deler v. Hauk [1860] SZRC 13 (Norr) · The Regional Court of Norrfeld
- Brenn v. Wendl [1885] SZRC 7 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
- Brenn v. Kolm [1897] SZRC 1 (Cap) · The Regional Court of The Capital District
- Bauer v. Metlienn [1904] SZHC 8 · The High Court
- Fenn v. Rieltberg [1922] SZRC 3 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Lenz v. Wendl [2000] SZRC 26 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.