Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Kessler v. Stiegl (1965)
[1965] SZHC 11
Decided 27 March 1965 · Chief Justice Emma Danfrer
The High Court[1965] SZHC 11
Kessler v. Stiegl. Before The High Court. The matter came on for hearing and was disposed of as set out below; the ruling is entered in the Law Reports under the year given.
Parties
- plaintiff: Gisela Kessler
- defendant: Luise Stiegl
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Vellhausen. Ruling: for the plaintiff.
So ordered. The court rose when the court resumed after the midday adjournment.
Authorities cited
- Uhl v. Fenn [1873] SZRC 5 (Norr) · The Regional Court of Norrfeld
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Sudfurt. Ruling: for the plaintiff.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.