Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Ninndirn v. Bohm (1933)
[1933] SZHC 8
Decided 26 March 1933 · Chief Justice Leon Fuchs
The High Court[1933] SZHC 8
In The High Court. Ninndirn v. Bohm. The court heard argument for the plaintiff and for the defendant and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- plaintiff: Roland Ninndirn
- defendant: Maria Bohm
Judgment
1. The proceedings were commenced in the usual form. 2. The plaintiff was heard first and the defendant in reply. 3. We reserved judgment and now deliver it.
Held
Concerning an article in The Evening Courier. Ruling: dismissed: fair comment.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
- Rabe v. Vogt [1932] SZHC 21 · The High Court
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: apology ordered.…
Subsequently cited in
- Jost v. Marrow [1957] SZRC 18 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
- Klollholt v. Ostrand [2009] SZRC 10 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.