Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Dietklall v. Sudmann (1927)
[1927] SZHC 5
Decided 7 March 1927 · Chief Justice Leon Fuchs
The High Court[1927] SZHC 5
Dietklall v. Sudmann. Before The High Court. The matter came on for hearing and was disposed of as set out below; the ruling is entered in the Law Reports under the year given.
Parties
- plaintiff: Emma Dietklall
- defendant: Frieda Sudmann
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Sanding. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.
The judgment was read in open court shortly after noon. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
None. The court proceeded on first principles and the terms of the acts concerned.
Subsequently cited in
- Ostrand v. Rusk [1965] SZRC 34 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Fenn v. Suhas [2014] SZRC 20 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.