Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Broffel v. Sossmosing (1926)
[1926] SZHC 24
Decided 11 December 1926 · Chief Justice Leon Fuchs
The High Court[1926] SZHC 24
In The High Court. Broffel v. Sossmosing. The court heard argument for the plaintiff and for the defendant and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- plaintiff: Frieda Broffel
- defendant: Gertrud Sossmosing
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning a contract for twelve mules not delivered. Ruling: contract void.
The judgment was read in open court at half past 3 in the afternoon. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
- Brenn v. Marrow [1866] SZRC 8 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Concerning a contract for coal not delivered. Ruling: contract void.…
- Rusk v. Keitmann [1867] SZRC 4 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Concerning a contract for coal not delivered. Ruling: for the defendant.…
- Rabe v. Brenner [1919] SZRC 6 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Concerning a contract for coal not delivered. Ruling: for the defendant.…
Subsequently cited in
- Brenn v. Brenn [1935] SZRC 4 (Cap) · The Regional Court of The Capital District
- Tinel v. Fromm [1957] SZRC 19 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.