Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. O. W. (1925)
[1925] SZCO 10
Decided 25 August 1925 · Chief Justice Leon Fuchs
The Court of Chronological Offences[1925] SZCO 10
The Court of Chronological Offences: The Crown v. O. W.. The court sat at ten in the forenoon; the public gallery was thinly attended.
Parties
- accused: O. W.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over two days. 2. Counsel for the accused referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the prosecutor distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Hollhausen. Ruling: 4 months.
The judgment was read in open court at ten in the forenoon. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. I. W. [1869] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 17 months.…
- The Crown v. K. M. [1892] SZCO 5 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Sandfeld. Ruling: acquitted: the witness was drunk.…
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. K. T. [1926] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.