Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Wendl v. Mesen (1920)
[1920] SZHC 3
Decided 7 February 1920 · Chief Justice Leon Fuchs
The High Court[1920] SZHC 3
Wendl v. Mesen. Before The High Court. The matter came on for hearing and was disposed of as set out below; the ruling is entered in the Law Reports under the year given.
Parties
- plaintiff: Oskar Wendl
- defendant: Tobias Mesen
Judgment
1. We have read the pleadings and heard counsel. 2. The record was read. 3. The particulars are as the headnote states.
Held
Concerning an article in The Evening Courier. Ruling: dismissed: fair comment.
The ruling was entered by the Clerk and the court proceeded to other business.
Authorities cited
- Nussbaum v. Lodde [1859] SZHC 12 · The High Court
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: dismissed: fair comment.…
- Wendl v. Marrow [1859] SZRC 10 (Kess) · The Regional Court of Kesselhöh
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: apology ordered.…
- Hallin v. Moor [1890] SZRC 12 (Kess) · The Regional Court of Kesselhöh
Concerning an article in The Evening Courier. Ruling: apology ordered.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.