Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. E. O. (1913)
[1913] SZCO 4
Decided 9 April 1913 · Chief Justice Piet Kaner
The Court of Chronological Offences[1913] SZCO 4
The Crown v. E. O., The Court of Chronological Offences. Judgment was delivered after a short adjournment, the parties being represented.
Parties
- accused: E. O.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over two days. 2. Counsel for the accused referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the prosecutor distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 1 months.
So ordered. The court rose late in the afternoon sitting.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. A. W. [1905] SZCO 10 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Tarnmund. Ruling: fined 77 marka.…
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. S. K. [1916] SZCO 9 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. P. B. [1922] SZCO 1 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. H. B. [1977] SZCO 14 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. P. L. [2007] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.