Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. H. W. (1912)
[1912] SZCO 6
Decided 5 July 1912 · Chief Justice Piet Kaner
The Court of Chronological Offences[1912] SZCO 6
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. H. W.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: H. W.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over two days. 2. Counsel for the accused referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the prosecutor distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 13 months.
The ruling was entered by the Clerk and the court proceeded to other business.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. G. H. [1863] SZCO 5 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Salzhafen. Ruling: fined 53 marka.…
Subsequently cited in
Not yet cited.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.