Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. O. K. (1911)
[1911] SZCO 7
Decided 1 May 1911 · Chief Justice Piet Kaner
The Court of Chronological Offences[1911] SZCO 7
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. O. K.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: O. K.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The accused pleaded; the prosecutor answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning possession of an unyear record (a school register). Ruling: acquitted: the year on the a wine label was illegible.
So ordered. The court rose at ten in the forenoon.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. I. J. [1874] SZCO 8 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning possession of an unyear record (a gravestone rubbing). Ruling: 5 years.…
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. H. H. [1940] SZCO 2 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. L. R. [1947] SZCO 8 · The Court of Chronological Offences
- The Crown v. K. K. [2014] SZCO 14 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.