Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. E. M. (1908)
[1908] SZCO 7
Decided 10 July 1908 · Chief Justice Piet Kaner
The Court of Chronological Offences[1908] SZCO 7
The Crown v. E. M., The Court of Chronological Offences. Judgment was delivered from the bench, the parties being represented.
Parties
- accused: E. M.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. We have read the pleadings and heard counsel. 2. The record was read. 3. The particulars are as the headnote states.
Held
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 2 months.
So ordered. The court rose at the rising of the court.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. M. M. [1871] SZCO 1 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 2 months.…
- The Crown v. M. S. [1894] SZCO 14 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 7 months.…
- The Crown v. B. H. [1905] SZCO 1 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning assertion of the unyear in print. Ruling: 8 years and the press forfeit.…
Subsequently cited in
The ruling has not yet been cited by a later court.
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.