Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Wendl v. Kinghilt (1906)
[1906] SZHC 9
Decided 10 May 1906 · Chief Justice Piet Kaner
The High Court[1906] SZHC 9
Wendl v. Kinghilt, The High Court. Judgment was delivered from the bench, the parties being represented.
Parties
- plaintiff: Erna Wendl
- defendant: Anneke Kinghilt
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning an article in The Schwartzistan Herald. Ruling: dismissed: fair comment.
The ruling was entered by the Clerk and the court proceeded to other business.
Authorities cited
- Ostrand v. Bismann [1900] SZRC 4 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Concerning an article in The Evening Courier. Ruling: apology ordered.…
Subsequently cited in
- Kriff v. Oberst [2015] SZRC 11 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.