Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Toshardt v. Teltnur (1899)
[1899] SZHC 9
Decided 2 June 1899 · Chief Justice Werner Rusk
The High Court[1899] SZHC 9
In The High Court. Toshardt v. Teltnur. The court heard argument for the plaintiff and for the defendant and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- plaintiff: Emil Toshardt
- defendant: Luise Teltnur
Judgment
1. The plaintiff pleaded; the defendant answered. 2. We have had the advantage of argument on both sides and have considered the papers. 3. The facts, so far as they are material, are set out in the headnote and are not in dispute.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Hollstadt. Ruling: for the defendant.
The papers are with the Clerk of the court and may be inspected by the parties. The judgment is entered in the Law Reports.
Authorities cited
- Tarn v. Fenn [1827] SZRC 2 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Berging. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.…
- Hallin v. Teltel [1828] SZRC 8 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Tarnmund. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.…
- Jost v. Rusk [1836] SZRC 4 (Norr) · The Regional Court of Norrfeld
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Norrwick. Ruling: for the plaintiff.…
Subsequently cited in
- Leichlanel v. Wendl [1949] SZRC 25 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.