Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
Kolm v. Bresrall (1804)
[1804] SZRC 1 (Osm)
Decided 10 January 1804
The Regional Court of The Osmoor[1804] SZRC 1 (Osm)
Kolm v. Bresrall. Before The Regional Court of The Osmoor. The matter came on for hearing and was disposed of as set out below; the ruling is entered in the Law Reports under the year given.
Parties
- plaintiff: Margit Kolm
- defendant: Berthe Bresrall
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over two days. 2. Counsel for the plaintiff referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the defendant distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning a boundary between two farms at Berging. Ruling: for the defendant.
The judgment was read in open court at half past 3 in the afternoon. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
None. The court proceeded on first principles and the terms of the acts concerned.
Subsequently cited in
- Fenn v. Nordmann [1805] SZRC 2 (Osm) · The Regional Court of The Osmoor
- Hallin v. Vetter [1805] SZRC 3 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
- Rusk v. Brenn [1805] SZRC 10 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
- Lenz v. Wendl [1805] SZRC 3 (Norr) · The Regional Court of Norrfeld
- Deiksoner v. Grau [1806] SZRC 5 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Hallin v. Brenn [1806] SZHC 5 · The High Court
- Brenn v. Rusk [1808] SZRC 1 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Kessler v. Wendl [1808] SZRC 4 (Ost) · The Regional Court of The Ostrand
- Keimann v. Hallin [1809] SZRC 15 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
- Teirich v. Kaltz [1812] SZRC 9 (West) · The Regional Court of Westgau
- Kaltz v. Brenn [1820] SZHC 15 · The High Court
- Lendvan v. Vikbeil [1840] SZRC 13 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
- Kicken v. Tresel [1845] SZHC 13 · The High Court
- Birk v. Naser [1944] SZRC 26 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.