Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The High Court
Fenn v. Fenn (1882)
[1882] SZHC 17
Decided 13 November 1882 · Chief Justice Hendrik Ehrlich
The High Court[1882] SZHC 17
In The High Court. Fenn v. Fenn. The court heard argument for the plaintiff and for the defendant and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- plaintiff: Ulrik Fenn
- defendant: Margit Fenn
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over a morning. 2. Counsel for the plaintiff referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the defendant distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning the reckoning of a lease spanning the removed year. Ruling: for the tenant.
So ordered. The court rose when the court resumed after the midday adjournment.
Authorities cited
None. The court proceeded on first principles and the terms of the acts concerned.
Subsequently cited in
- Tiendiech v. Brenn [1941] SZRC 11 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark
- Fenn v. Sandar [1979] SZRC 7 (Cap) · The Regional Court of The Capital District
- Stiegl v. Nelmann [2016] SZHC 25 · The High Court
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.