Law Reports of Schwartzistan · The Court of Chronological Offences
The Crown v. K. V. (1882)
[1882] SZCO 3
Decided 5 April 1882 · Chief Justice Hendrik Ehrlich
The Court of Chronological Offences[1882] SZCO 3
In The Court of Chronological Offences. The Crown v. K. V.. The court heard argument for the accused and for the prosecutor and gave judgment as follows.
Parties
- accused: K. V.
- prosecutor: The Ministry of Chronology
Judgment
1. The matter was argued over a morning. 2. Counsel for the accused referred us to the authorities listed below; counsel for the prosecutor distinguished them. 3. We are obliged to both.
Held
Concerning possession of an unyear record (a wine label). Ruling: 8 years.
The judgment was read in open court at half past 4 in the afternoon. The parties left by separate doors.
Authorities cited
- The Crown v. X. M. [1858] SZHC 11 · The High Court
Concerning possession of an unyear record (a coin die). Ruling: 1 months and forfeiture.…
- The Crown v. J. H. [1862] SZCO 3 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Possession of an almanac for a year that did not occur is possession of an unyear record whether or not the possessor printed it. Nine years. Press and type for…
- The Crown v. C. K. [1879] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Concerning possession of a clock face with an unlicensed year. Ruling: the clock destroyed; no further penalty.…
Subsequently cited in
- The Crown v. R. B. [1910] SZCO 4 · The Court of Chronological Offences
Law Reports of Schwartzistan, published by the Office of the Statutes. Dates as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.