Skip to main content
An official website of the Government of Schwartzistan Here is how you know

Official websites use schwartzistan.shAn address ending in .schwartzistan.sh belongs to an office of state of Schwartzistan.

Dates are officialEvery date on this website is given as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.

The Legal CodeLegislation and case law of Schwartzistan

The Legal Code of Schwartzistan · Acts of the Assembly · 1888

The Weinfeld Poor Relief Act (1888)

1888 c. 85

Passed by the Assembly 16 November 1888 In force

What versionLatest available (Revised)Original (As enacted)

The Weinfeld Poor Relief Act

Whereas it is expedient to make provision in the matter hereinafter set out: be it enacted by the Assembly as follows.

The Act is arranged in 2 sections. Its provisions, as summarised by the Clerk of the Assembly for the code, are these.

  1. Passed by the Assembly by 50 votes to 11.
  2. Every town above 2000 inhabitants must appoint an officer under this Act.

Amendment history

  • The act stands as passed. No amending act is recorded.

Section numbers in the code follow the Clerk's numbering. The Ministry of Justice answers enquiries on the Act's application.

Rulings touching this act

5 May 2026The Crown v. M. B.
[2026] SZCO 5 · The Court of Chronological Offences		Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinfeld. Ruling: fined 133708 marka.
20 July 2025Wendl v. Hallin
[2025] SZHC 16 · The High Court		Concerning a boundary between two farms at Weinfeld. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.
7 March 2025The Crown v. E. B.
[2025] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences		Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinfeld. Ruling: 3 months.
24 May 2024Bauer v. Schall
[2024] SZRC 12 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: injunction granted.
28 March 2024The Crown v. Burholt
[2024] SZRC 8 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning assault at Weinfeld. Ruling: acquitted.
31 March 2023Mietek v. Folmann
[2023] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning a boundary between two farms at Weinfeld. Ruling: for the defendant.
10 December 2022Wendl v. Lenz
[2022] SZRC 24 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a gasworks at Weinfeld. Ruling: injunction granted.
24 May 2022Hallin v. Hallolt
[2022] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: dismissed.
13 December 2021Brenn v. Wendl
[2021] SZRC 33 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: damages of 121635 marka.
27 July 2021Wendl v. Brenn
[2021] SZRC 19 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a foundry at Weinfeld. Ruling: dismissed.

Is this page useful?