The Legal Code of Schwartzistan · Acts of the Assembly · 1851
The Weinfeld Marsh Regiments Pay Act (1851)
1851 c. 60
Passed by the Assembly 9 September 1851 In force
The Weinfeld Marsh Regiments Pay Act
Be it enacted by the Assembly of Schwartzistan, with the assent of the Grand Chancellor, as follows.
The Act is arranged in 3 sections. Its provisions, as summarised by the Clerk of the Assembly for the code, are these.
- Passed by the Assembly without a division.
- Charged to the Annual War Appropriation.
- Passed unanimously, as is customary for measures concerning the Line.
Amendment history
- F1 Amended by The Marsh Regiments Pay (Amendment) Act, 15 May 2011. Passed by the Assembly without a division.
The Act is printed in the code as passed. Amending acts, if any, are listed above with their dates.
Rulings touching this act
| 5 May 2026 | The Crown v. M. B. [2026] SZCO 5 · The Court of Chronological Offences | Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinfeld. Ruling: fined 133708 marka. |
| 20 July 2025 | Wendl v. Hallin [2025] SZHC 16 · The High Court | Concerning a boundary between two farms at Weinfeld. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch. |
| 7 March 2025 | The Crown v. E. B. [2025] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences | Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinfeld. Ruling: 3 months. |
| 24 May 2024 | Bauer v. Schall [2024] SZRC 12 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: injunction granted. |
| 28 March 2024 | The Crown v. Burholt [2024] SZRC 8 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning assault at Weinfeld. Ruling: acquitted. |
| 31 March 2023 | Mietek v. Folmann [2023] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning a boundary between two farms at Weinfeld. Ruling: for the defendant. |
| 10 December 2022 | Wendl v. Lenz [2022] SZRC 24 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a gasworks at Weinfeld. Ruling: injunction granted. |
| 24 May 2022 | Hallin v. Hallolt [2022] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: dismissed. |
| 13 December 2021 | Brenn v. Wendl [2021] SZRC 33 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: damages of 121635 marka. |
| 27 July 2021 | Wendl v. Brenn [2021] SZRC 19 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a foundry at Weinfeld. Ruling: dismissed. |