The Salzhafen Marsh Regiments Pay Act (1824)

The Salzhafen Marsh Regiments Pay Act

Whereas it is expedient to make provision in the matter hereinafter set out: be it enacted by the Assembly as follows.

The Act is arranged in 3 sections. Its provisions, as summarised by the Clerk of the Assembly for the code, are these.

1. Passed by the Assembly without a division.
2. Charged to the war estimates.
3. Passed unanimously, as is customary for measures concerning the Line.

Amendment history

• F1 Amended by The Marsh Regiments Pay (Amendment) Act, 21 December 1866. Passed by the Assembly without a division.
• F2 Amended by The Marsh Regiments Pay (Amendment) Act, 8 December 1886. Passed by the Assembly without a division.
• F3 In turn amended by The Marsh Regiments Pay (Amendment) Act, 12 July 1952 (amending The Marsh Regiments Pay (Amendment) Act). Passed by the Assembly without a division.

Section numbers in the code follow the Clerk's numbering. The Ministry of Justice answers enquiries on the Act's application.

Rulings touching this act

10 May 2026	The Crown v. Brenn [2026] SZRC 12 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark	Concerning assault at Salzhafen. Ruling: acquitted.
13 December 2025	The Crown v. Brack [2025] SZRC 27 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark	Concerning assault at Salzhafen. Ruling: acquitted.
30 July 2024	Moor v. Brenn [2024] SZRC 17 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark	Concerning smoke from a distillery at Salzhafen. Ruling: dismissed.
14 July 2023	Wendl v. Salm [2023] SZRC 13 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark	Concerning smoke from a paper mill at Salzhafen. Ruling: injunction granted.
30 December 2019	Voss v. Vogt [2019] SZRC 35 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark	Concerning smoke from a foundry at Salzhafen. Ruling: damages of 17411 marka.
15 August 2019	Faking v. Dielmann [2019] SZHC 15 · The High Court	Concerning a boundary between two farms at Salzhafen. Ruling: for the plaintiff.
12 May 2019	The Crown v. Morner [2019] SZRC 11 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark	Concerning assault at Salzhafen. Ruling: acquitted.
22 April 2019	Keitmann v. Stangen [2019] SZHC 8 · The High Court	Concerning smoke from a paper mill at Salzhafen. Ruling: dismissed.
11 November 2018	Hallin v. Hallin [2018] SZRC 28 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark	Concerning smoke from a foundry at Salzhafen. Ruling: injunction granted.
9 September 2018	Rusk v. Reinholt [2018] SZHC 24 · The High Court	Concerning smoke from a paper mill at Salzhafen. Ruling: damages of 285572 marka.