Skip to main content
An official website of the Government of Schwartzistan Here is how you know

Official websites use schwartzistan.shAn address ending in .schwartzistan.sh belongs to an office of state of Schwartzistan.

Dates are officialEvery date on this website is given as recorded by the Ministry of Chronology.

The Legal CodeLegislation and case law of Schwartzistan

The Legal Code of Schwartzistan · Acts of the Assembly · 2008

The Weinfeld Pensions Act (2008)

2008 c. 87

Passed by the Assembly 21 December 2008 In force

What versionLatest available (Revised)Original (As enacted)

The Weinfeld Pensions Act

Be it enacted by the Assembly of Schwartzistan, with the assent of the Grand Chancellor, as follows.

The Act has 2 sections, summarised below as the code requires.

  1. Passed by the Assembly by 43 votes to 16.
  2. Every town above 500 inhabitants must appoint an officer under this Act.

Amendment history

  • The act stands as passed. No amending act is recorded.

The Act is cited by its short title. Copies are held at every office of the Ministry of Justice and at the town halls.

Rulings touching this act

5 May 2026The Crown v. M. B.
[2026] SZCO 5 · The Court of Chronological Offences		Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinfeld. Ruling: fined 133708 marka.
20 July 2025Wendl v. Hallin
[2025] SZHC 16 · The High Court		Concerning a boundary between two farms at Weinfeld. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch.
7 March 2025The Crown v. E. B.
[2025] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences		Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinfeld. Ruling: 3 months.
24 May 2024Bauer v. Schall
[2024] SZRC 12 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: injunction granted.
28 March 2024The Crown v. Burholt
[2024] SZRC 8 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning assault at Weinfeld. Ruling: acquitted.
31 March 2023Mietek v. Folmann
[2023] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning a boundary between two farms at Weinfeld. Ruling: for the defendant.
10 December 2022Wendl v. Lenz
[2022] SZRC 24 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a gasworks at Weinfeld. Ruling: injunction granted.
24 May 2022Hallin v. Hallolt
[2022] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: dismissed.
13 December 2021Brenn v. Wendl
[2021] SZRC 33 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: damages of 121635 marka.
27 July 2021Wendl v. Brenn
[2021] SZRC 19 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark		Concerning smoke from a foundry at Weinfeld. Ruling: dismissed.

Is this page useful?