The Legal Code of Schwartzistan · Acts of the Assembly · 1808
The Weinfeld Pensions Act (1808)
1808 c. 26
Passed by the Assembly 3 July 1808 In force
The Weinfeld Pensions Act
The Assembly of Schwartzistan enacts as follows.
The Act is arranged in 3 sections. Its provisions, as summarised by the Clerk of the Assembly for the code, are these.
- Passed by the Assembly by 43 votes to 9.
- Every town above 1000 inhabitants must appoint an officer under this Act.
- Comes into force on 1 January 1809.
Amendment history
- F1 Amended by The Pensions (Amendment) Act, 18 October 1907. Passed by the Assembly by 44 votes to 19.
Section numbers in the code follow the Clerk's numbering. The Ministry of Justice answers enquiries on the Act's application.
Rulings touching this act
| 5 May 2026 | The Crown v. M. B. [2026] SZCO 5 · The Court of Chronological Offences | Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinfeld. Ruling: fined 133708 marka. |
| 20 July 2025 | Wendl v. Hallin [2025] SZHC 16 · The High Court | Concerning a boundary between two farms at Weinfeld. Ruling: boundary fixed at the old ditch. |
| 7 March 2025 | The Crown v. E. B. [2025] SZCO 6 · The Court of Chronological Offences | Concerning assertion of the unyear in a public house at Weinfeld. Ruling: 3 months. |
| 24 May 2024 | Bauer v. Schall [2024] SZRC 12 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: injunction granted. |
| 28 March 2024 | The Crown v. Burholt [2024] SZRC 8 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning assault at Weinfeld. Ruling: acquitted. |
| 31 March 2023 | Mietek v. Folmann [2023] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning a boundary between two farms at Weinfeld. Ruling: for the defendant. |
| 10 December 2022 | Wendl v. Lenz [2022] SZRC 24 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a gasworks at Weinfeld. Ruling: injunction granted. |
| 24 May 2022 | Hallin v. Hallolt [2022] SZRC 6 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: dismissed. |
| 13 December 2021 | Brenn v. Wendl [2021] SZRC 33 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a distillery at Weinfeld. Ruling: damages of 121635 marka. |
| 27 July 2021 | Wendl v. Brenn [2021] SZRC 19 (Sud) · The Regional Court of The Sudmark | Concerning smoke from a foundry at Weinfeld. Ruling: dismissed. |